Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Best Energy Stocks To Own Right Now

tags:AMBA,MGI,PSTI,

Shares of Peabody Energy Co. (NYSE:BTU) have received an average rating of “Buy” from the nine brokerages that are currently covering the company, MarketBeat.com reports. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have assigned a hold rating and six have given a buy rating to the company. The average 12 month target price among brokerages that have covered the stock in the last year is $46.29.

BTU has been the topic of several research analyst reports. ValuEngine cut Peabody Energy from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Thursday, August 2nd. Zacks Investment Research raised Peabody Energy from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating and set a $54.00 price objective on the stock in a research report on Friday, June 8th. MKM Partners reissued a “buy” rating and issued a $53.00 price objective on shares of Peabody Energy in a research report on Wednesday, June 6th. Finally, B. Riley boosted their price objective on Peabody Energy from $51.00 to $52.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, July 25th.

Best Energy Stocks To Own Right Now: Ambarella, Inc.(AMBA)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Motley Fool Transcribing]

    Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) Q2 2019 Earnings Conference CallAug. 30, 2018 4:30 p.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator 

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Ambarella (AMBA)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Cypress Semiconductor (NASDAQ:CY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

  • [By Harsh Chauhan]

    Investors' enthusiasm for Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) came crashing down after the video-processing-chip specialist's fiscal first-quarter performance didn't do much to dispel fears that it was finding it difficult to grow despite operating in verticals that promise a lot of opportunities.

Best Energy Stocks To Own Right Now: Moneygram International, Inc.(MGI)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Moneygram International (MGI)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Moneygram International (MGI)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By ]

    Cramer was bearish on Xilinx (XLNX) , Celgene (CELG) , Exelixis (EXEL) , Moneygram (MGI) , Monster Beverage (MNST) , SunCoke Energy Partners (SXCP) and Mattel (MAT) .

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Cardtronics (NASDAQ: MGI) and Moneygram International (NASDAQ:MGI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    BidaskClub downgraded shares of Moneygram International (NASDAQ:MGI) from a sell rating to a strong sell rating in a report issued on Thursday.

    Several other brokerages also recently commented on MGI. Zacks Investment Research downgraded shares of Moneygram International from a buy rating to a sell rating in a report on Monday, May 14th. ValuEngine downgraded shares of Moneygram International from a sell rating to a strong sell rating in a report on Wednesday, May 2nd. Finally, TheStreet downgraded shares of Moneygram International from a c rating to a d+ rating in a report on Friday, March 16th. Four analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating and one has issued a hold rating to the stock. Moneygram International has an average rating of Sell and a consensus target price of $9.75.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcribing]

    MoneyGram International (NASDAQ:MGI) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 11, 2019 4:30 p.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator 

Best Energy Stocks To Own Right Now: Pluristem Therapeutics Inc.(PSTI)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Here are some of the news headlines that may have impacted Accern’s rankings:

    Get Pluristem Therapeutics alerts: Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. (PSTI) Given Consensus Rating of “Buy” by Analysts (americanbankingnews.com) Head-To-Head Analysis: Pluristem Therapeutics (PSTI) & Amgen (AMGN) (americanbankingnews.com) Pre-Eclampsia Treatment Market Outlook 2025, Global Opportunity & Growth Analysis, Key Players – Alnylam … (menafn.com) Flickering Three Stocks: Golden Star Resources Ltd. (NYSE:GSS), Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:PSTI … (thestreetpoint.com) Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. (PSTI) moves -0.72% higher to SMA-50 (nasdaqplace.com)

    Pluristem Therapeutics stock traded up $0.01 during trading hours on Monday, reaching $1.37. The stock had a trading volume of 3,754 shares, compared to its average volume of 201,217. The firm has a market cap of $150.78 million, a PE ratio of -4.28 and a beta of 0.32. Pluristem Therapeutics has a 52 week low of $1.12 and a 52 week high of $2.12.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Shares of Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:PSTI) have earned an average recommendation of “Buy” from the seven research firms that are currently covering the stock, Marketbeat reports. Two analysts have rated the stock with a hold recommendation and five have assigned a buy recommendation to the company. The average twelve-month price objective among analysts that have covered the stock in the last year is $4.13.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Pluristem Therapeutics (PSTI)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Pluristem Therapeutics (PSTI)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Sunday, February 24, 2019

InterDigital Inc (IDCC) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

InterDigital Inc  (NASDAQ:IDCC)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 21, 2019, 10:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, and welcome to the InterDigital Fourth Quarter 2018 Earnings Call. This call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Patrick Van de Wille. Please go ahead, sir.

Patrick Van de Wille -- Chief Communications Officer

Thank you very much, and good morning, everyone and welcome to InterDigital's Fourth Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. With me this morning are Bill Merritt, our President and CEO; Kai Oistamo, our COO; and Rich Brezski, our CFO. Consistent with last quarter's call we'll offer some highlights about the quarter and the Company and then open the call up for questions.

Before we begin our remarks, I need to remind you that in this call we will make forward-looking statements regarding our current beliefs, plans and expectations, which are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from results and events contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include those set forth in our earnings release and our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed this morning, and from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of them whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

In addition, today's presentation may contain references to non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP operating expenses. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure are included in our fourth quarter 2018 financial metrics tracker, which can be accessed on our homepage www.interdigital.com by clicking on the link on the left side of the homepage that says financial metrics tracker for Q4, 2018.

With that taken care of, I'll turn the call over to Bill.

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on the call this morning. As you saw from this morning's press release we delivered another very solid year. Financially, we performed very well and strategically we've made some very important moves that we believe will drive substantial value going forward. Rich will focus on the financial results and Kai will review some of the quarter's operational highlights.

Let me talk about the strategic positioning. At our Investor Day a few months back I have the opportunity to talk about the amazing transition the Company has gone through in the last 12 months. Let me summarize what I said then and also update as to the actions we've have taken since our Investor Day. At the beginning of 2018, we had a single focus as a Company, developing standardized wireless technology for mobile device. And this has been our focus for years. Now there's something we said about being laser-focused. It allows you to get very good at what you do. And that's what we did. We became extraordinarily skilled at developing fundamental wireless technology and contributing that technology to global standards.

We did it in 2G, 3G and 4G and we were on track to do it again with 5G. With those efforts, we believe we created one of the most valuable patent portfolios in the world involving wireless technologies, one that typically ranked somewhere in the three or four in the world in the independent third-party studies evaluating who owns essential patents for 3G and 4G. As a result, we built a current revenue platform that has a strong stable base, but also has a significant growth ahead, both in terms of licensing new customers and also addressing the new markets that will be enabled by 5G, which is certainly the most revolutionary of the wireless standards today.

Our success lens asked the question confronting any Company that has had a long highly profitable one. What else can we do to drive even greater value? For us the answer was simple, expand our technology offering to our wireless handset consumers, but in doing so, ensure we don't lose our focus. Maintaining focus meant finding technology offerings that are synergistic with our wireless capability. Synergistic not only in the underlying single processing skills, but it is how one thinks about this technology.

For example, all these technologies are ones that will be typically thought as a compliments to one another. Do they work together in some manner? Can they be designed together? It also not developing a vast array of different technologies, instead, we would focus on one more technology and do it extraordinarily well. Maintaining focus also meant staying fixed on standardized technologies. Standard derisk, what can otherwise be viewed as a very risky long-term technology development, and also results in a single point of sale that's all about expertise not scale.

The technologies we develop may not come to market for 10 years. In a traditional sense, not knowing for 10 years whether a technology you are developing is going to have a market application is a very risky bet. However, the standard provide a near-term indication of value. If the contribution gets excepted into the standard then you know there will be market uptake of your innovation, so long as there is market uptake of the standard itself. It's still risky, but the reward is significant if we innovate correctly. So it's a risk we're going to take.

Staying focused also meant remaining focused on licensing. When you look at other licensing companies that have struggled I believe it's because they have mixed licensing businesses with product businesses. I appreciate that some could make it work. But more often than not conflicts arise that result in those businesses running sub-optimally. We're good at licensing. Indeed we're very good at it. And the Board and I saw no reason to dilute that strength by mixing in other types of businesses.

Now looking back at where we wanted the journey to take us and where we eventually landed. I'm thrilled to report that we've arrived exactly where we wanted to go, at a modest price and at a really good place. We've changed from a single technology company focused on a single market connected devices to a much larger Company with substantial innovation strength in two key technologies, video and wireless. Those two technologies operate in three massive overlapping and complementary markets: wireless devices, IoT and consumer electronics. That represents a very significant value creation opportunity for the Company as the addressable licensing market in each of these segments is measured in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

Equally important, the significant change in the Company did not affect our focus. Our video and wireless R&D investment will both be standards driven. The technologies are also very synergistic in terms of the underlying engineering skills as well as how they work together in consumer devices. Indeed, we've research going on within InterDigital for years, specifically targeting video innovation that addresses the transmission of video over wireless networks. Assuming we close on the most recent transaction with Technicolor, we will control the video R&D team in addition to our wireless R&D team. That combined research team will represent the strongest and most talented teams in the world focused on these two technologies and one of the largest teams in the world focused on technology standards.

We will also have Technicolor as a paying customer with our production services team providing superb technology direction for advanced video processing techniques. And we had a word about how excited we are at the prospects of Technicolor's R&I team joining the Company. During the months since our acquisition of their licensing business, we've been able to engage with them as part of our current joint research and arrangement. That collaboration has given us a view into what a fantastic team they are, truly living up to their global reputation. They share our culture for deep innovation and bring a set of skills that will be incredibly valuable to us going forward. Beyond research, our monetization plan will remain via licensing. That is what we excel at and how we generate the greatest return. So while we are much bigger and operating in more markets, our fundamental DNA remains unchanged.

Lastly, we got to this new place at a very low cost. The acquisition of the Technicolor licensing business cost $150 million, plus any earnout on future consumer electronics licensing revenue. With the new transaction in which we expect to acquire Technicolor's research team that earnout has substantially reduced. As Rich will discuss we also remain confident that despite the significant growth in the Company and its opportunities we can return the business to the 2017 cost levels. So we're all in for what amount to less than $2 to $3 per share or just a small portion of our cash balance, we have greatly and positively transformed the business. That is very exciting. Of course, the key is now to deliver and that's what 2019 is all about. For that end, we have revamped the management team with precisely this type of opportunity in mind. They all have six months or more under their belts and are ready and able to deliver -- to drive value. But these are very exciting times here.

With that let me turn the call over to Kai.

Kai Oistamo -- Chief Operating Officer

Thanks, Bill, and good morning, everyone and thanks for joining us. With Bill having taken us through the strategy, I wanted to provide a view of the main operational points that are on our dashboard. First, looking at the wireless R&D. We have had a tremendous quarter and maintained our course of being primary contributors of core technologies in the wireless market including 5G research.

As (inaudible) fanfare from various companies these days about the first 5G devices and while that is exciting, that's just the first generation of 5G and much of the most exciting work is being done at the network transformation level. We are proud to say that our research efforts in the areas of cloud networks, virtualized radio and other areas are among the most comprehensive in the space. In the fourth quarter, we announced the successful trial of cloud native deployment that would enable industrial mobile networks to be realized as a pure cloud-based applications running on easily deployed cloud services instead of expensive specialized equipment.

We also demonstrated in Taiwan as part of their 5G-CORAL research consortium, a comprehensive fog and edge deployment, the technology that takes away for cost savings and low latency deployments like robotics and drones. Our work in 5G has been only been recognized not just with the contributions in standards, but also in external recognition. InterDigital received a special commendation at Global Telecoms Awards for advancing road to 5G after having won other awards earlier in the year. And while it's still early days for tallying up contributions and IP in the standard, our internal metrics reassure us that we are well on our track to maintain at the leadership position that we have had in 3G and 4G. That is a strong position.

To repeat what Bill highlighted our patent portfolio typically ranks in the top three or four in the world of independent third-party studies. We also continued our integration work with the acquisition of Technicolor's licensing business, which has been going very well. Rich will provide some guidance on how well that integration is going in terms of the numbers, but on the operational side our focus has been on technology collaboration and organizing the licensing teams to take advantage of the new market opportunity.

Under our Chief Licensing Officer, Tim Berghuis, we defined two licensing teams each with specific staffing leadership and goals to grow the wireless opportunity on one hand and to address the new consumer electronic opportunity in the other. In terms of a technology collaboration, our video team has worked strongly with their counterparts at Technicolor R&I, and will be co-demonstrating technologies at Mobile World Congress next week in Barcelona. And of course last week we announced our binding offer to acquire Technicolor's R&I division, which would take things to a new level and make InterDigital Labs to be one of the largest and most diverse technology standards R&D teams in the world.

(Inaudible) on licensing, we were able to assign a new license with Sony late in the fourth quarter that once again underscores the tremendous work relationship that we have with that Company. In addition to license, Sony has also became an investor in Chordant, our IoT platform business, which spun off as a stand-alone Company three weeks ago. This week, Deutsche Telecom announced that Chordant was the platform provider for their IoT solution optimizer, which is a great win for Chordant. And our task -- talks with other unlicensed companies continue. Some of you may have noticed that Huawei started the year by bringing a case against us in China. Just to put that in context, when we reached the agreement with Huawei in 2014, our two companies had several actions pending in court. So while we do prefer a simple discussion to reach fair agreements we also understand that litigation is sometimes made part of those discussions.

Finally, a word about China in general. It is very difficult -- it is very much on people's minds these days as China and U.S. continue their trade negotiations. It is true that context of uncertainty around outcomes has an influence on license negotiations. It will be silly to pretend otherwise. However, the entire matter has a very positive component to us, which is that the U.S. administration has made it clear that IT matters and the respect for IT and global trade rules is one of, if not, the most important component of trade talks. There is a strong level of support out of the administration and that support has been narrowed in Europe and other areas.

So our outlook remains positive and our government affairs team is working very hard to make sure that the appropriate level of awareness of our issues exists in the right circles. And of course, we continue our talks offering neutral arbitration as a way of resolving economic differences and making sure that the prospective licensees understand not only the need to license but our potential value as a partner.

With that let me turn over the call to Rich.

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Kai. As you heard from Bill, we are very excited to follow up our July acquisition of Technicolor's technology licensing business with the pending acquisition of Technicolor's world-class Research & Innovation team. My remarks today will focus first on the status of the former and second on the financial expectations for the latter. One year ago when we announced our intention to acquire Technicolor's technology licensing business I knew that that was a long-term value play and would temporarily add cost.

More recently I noted that we expected our fourth quarter 2018 and first quarter 2019 operating expenses and capitalize patent prosecution costs would be $5 million to $10 million higher than Q3, 2018 levels before coming down over the balance of 2019. On both occasions, I said we expect our cost should return to 2017 levels by early 2020. I am happy to report that as of fourth quarter 2018, the ongoing economic cost of our business has already returned to levels comparable to 2017.

I'll expand on that in a moment, but first I'm also happy to report that even including the anticipated cost of the pending acquisition of Technicolor's R&I division, we still expect to return our ongoing economic cost levels to the approximate 2017 levels by the end of 2020. As previously discussed in measuring our cost levels for this purpose, we included few adjustments that are necessary to convert our GAAP operating expenses to a more meaningful measure of the ongoing economic cost of the transaction. These include removing litigation, removing depreciation and amortization and adding capitalized patent costs. An additional adjustment is part of the reimbursements, which are present in the first Technicolor deal and will become more prominent as a result of the pending acquisition.

Let me expand for a moment on partner reimbursements. Under the terms of the acquisitions and related partnerships, we will receive full or partial reimbursement for cost related to specified activities that benefit our partners. For example under the first Technicolor agreement, we are partially reimbursed by both Sony and the financial investor for the cost of filing and maintaining the patents related to our Madison program. Due to the differences in our partner relationships, accounting rules require us to report those reimbursement in different ways.

For example some of those reimbursements offset our operating expenses on our GAAP P&L, while others are recorded as revenue. There is even a small amount that was prepaid to Technicolor and essentially acquired as cash under the July 2018 acquisition. For purposes of measuring our ongoing economic costs, we subtract the operating expenses the partner reimbursements that were either prepaid or reported as revenue. For clarity, we will disclose these reimbursements in the financial metrics we publish each quarter.

With that as a background, our economic cost for Q4, 2018 is almost $58 million. However, that includes about $8 million of transaction and integration costs. Excluding these items, our ongoing economic cost is about $50 million for the quarter or $200 million on an annualized basis, which is only slightly above our comparative metric for 2017. So based on the metric we have previously discussed, we have already reduced our ongoing economic cost to levels comparable with 2017. Of course, cost management requires continual effort. We will continue to see some additional cost for a time particularly with the pending acquisition of Technicolor's R&I division, but our ongoing economic costs are in line.

Moving on to that pending acquisition, our view is that the transaction can essentially be cost neutral, even while acquiring a low-class team of 150-plus engineers. There are a number of levers that help make that possible. First our cost -- our current cost reflect that as a result of our prior agreement, we are already paying $5 million a year toward R&I's efforts. The second is that French labor cost is materially lower in part due to significant research and development credits from the French government.

Finally, third is the partner reimbursements I alluded to before. In this case Technicolor will be funding a portion of our research in exchange for certain rights. So when completed, the transaction would increase our research capacity significantly, but only have a small impact on expenses. And as I said earlier, our expectation would be to return the ongoing economic cost of the business to approximate 2017 levels by the end of 2020. As per usual, I will end with a few words on capital allocation. With no cash purchase price for the Technicolor R&I team and our plans to hold the line on expenses we have continued to repurchase shares of our stock under our recently increased authorization. We returned $130 million of capital to our shareholders through share buybacks from the start of the fourth quarter through yesterday, thereby continuing our commitment to return excess capital to our shareholders.

I'll now turn it back to Patrick.

Patrick Van de Wille -- Chief Communications Officer

Thank you very much, Rich. Moderator, if you can open the call for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Charlie Anderson with Dougherty & Company.

Charles Anderson -- Dougherty & Company -- Analyst

Yes, thanks for taking my questions. Good morning everyone. So I wanted to start with kind of a question about sort of the pipeline of opportunity. Bill, you mentioned that you've got a new team in place. You've got Technicolor in-house. You have a bigger patent portfolio. You've got the R&I team coming in later. You've got Hillcrest for a few years now. So I guess I'm just kind of curious, taking all that in, sort of what are your expectations in terms of the signing new licensees and then maybe renewals as well in 2019? And then I've got a follow-up.

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

So if you look at -- if you break the opportunities into buckets, right, so you have the licensing of folks for -- under the (inaudible) program for mobile devices, right? As Kai mentioned in his talks, there's a lot going on with China, with the trade talks and a lot of other things involving that area of the world. I think the long-term trajectory there is very positive because it's pushing a positive IP environment and pushing structural change within China. I'd say we don't have to wait for all of that to occur. There's already pressure being put to that process on a variety of folks over there.

So with the discussions with the prospective licensees in China continue, I think we feel like there's good opportunity to push them over line this year, but obviously it's always the case that we need to do things at the right level and the right value, and not so much to be driven just by the timing. But I think -- I think there's opportunity in that space. And so that's really the bulk of what the opportunity within the wireless handset licensing business.

The second opportunity is within the consumer electronics space. So that, I'd say mostly focused on digital TVs. That's the biggest addressable market within that space at least today for us. There's certainly opportunity that can be driven over time with respect to the broader consumer experience. So there's good opportunity with a large TV manufacturers. And so we're engaged with them now. We picked up some of those discussions that were already have been started by Technicolor other are sort of fresh. We are early in the game there and we'll see how that precedes, but certainly we have good assets and there's good relationships, we already have with these customers. So I think there's an opportunity as well in that space for success in 2019, but again early -- early stages. The third piece of the pipeline is IoT. That I'd say is still early right? So the market on IoT itself is still developing, still positive -- very positive signs in terms of deployment of oneM2M as a standard -- Kai noted in his remarks, the success in Chordant in getting some of its solutions adopted. So I think that 2019 is mostly a year of continuing to position the technology in a positive way, somehow in a price discovery and also creating a go-forward structure on the licensing side. I would note that the component of IoT is sometimes better than IoT, sometimes it is involved with the (inaudible) things like the Avanci initiatives around wireless (inaudible). They continued to push forward in the market. I think this is a year for them. I think they had to work through some structural issues in the market because the automobile manufacturers are not the typical licensee. I think they're having success in sort of working those structural issues, so I would say that 2019 is also a year for them to deliver as well.

Charles Anderson -- Dougherty & Company -- Analyst

Great. And then a couple of questions for Rich. Rich or one of you could maybe just help us on just some of the elements in Q4 on the operating expense side that were sort of one-time in nature related to transaction, et cetera, that potentially don't recur in Q1. Is there any specific in Q1, we should be on the lookout for as far as maybe a one-time effect also on OpEx? I'm talking both on the GAAP and non-GAAP. And then I've got one more follow-up.

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

Sure Charlie. So, a couple of things, I think in both the release and in my comments, I talked a little bit -- some of the transaction and integration costs, which what one view as the one-time on the other hand, some of those costs recur into the second quarter because integration continues. And then beyond that, we also, of course have costs as we prepare for the pending acquisition of Technicolor's R&I business. So aside from integration-type things, there's also a P&L charge associated with chewing up some balance sheet items that came over in connection with the acquisition. And that's something that, just as you move forward over time, their fair value, you're putting in liquidity in the fair value of assets and liabilities and that get updated over time. So that's another element of it as well.

Charles Anderson -- Dougherty & Company -- Analyst

Okay. And then I think I heard a reference to some share buybacks activity in 2019 as well. Could you maybe update us on how many shares you bought at whatever price in 2019?

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. What I'll do, Charlie, is direct you to our footnote where we described -- what we've done on a subsequent event basis. I think that the figure for -- at the beginning of Q4 through yesterday is $130 million. I don't have in my fingertips to split between what was in the fourth quarter versus the beginning of 2019.

Charles Anderson -- Dougherty & Company -- Analyst

Yes. $67 million I think in Q4, Rich, it looked like.

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, OK.

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

Okay, sounds good. Thanks very much guys.

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Eric Wold from B. Riley & Co.

Eric Wold -- B. Riley & Co. -- Analyst

Thank you. Good morning guys. Two questions. I guess, one, a follow-up on one of the past ones, kind of around the unsigned handset operation in China. I guess with the understanding that the main hurdle is kind of the past payments that continued to accumulate and their own declining market share issues, I mean, is there a path for settlement without InterDigital kind of giving up the brunt of the upside, performing litigation? Do they have attractive patent portfolios you could lay your hands on? Are there paths to revenues now with Technicolor? Maybe just give us some sense there.

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

So is that with respect to the specific customer? I missed the front end of your question, just to make sure I got the right question.

Eric Wold -- B. Riley & Co. -- Analyst

Just the unsigned Chinese handset operator, kind of as a group.

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So, look -- while it's a group, I'd say everyone in the group is very different from one another. So you've got people that have had increasing fortunes. They got people with declining fortunes. People are operating steady state. We also know that things can change really rapidly over there, depending upon a variety of things, both competition, trade and otherwise. So those are the things we do need to take into account when -- and Kai mentioned, it would be silly for us to suggest that what's going on China isn't impacting the pace of things. But I would tell you -- still tell you that discussions continue there. There's lots of ways, but I'd say they are different, for each customer to try to work within whatever level of uncertainty that they have. So certainly getting access to patents is a really good way for us to secure value and for the customer to be able to manage the license cost in a better way. And, yes, there's great innovation that goes on within that group.

There is also -- the way you can structure agreements where you can look at running royalties versus fixed payments and upfront payments of kind, try to bound risk for both parties and so the nice thing is we've developed a lot of tools over the years as a Company or years at the Company. We're not a single-template licensing house. Every deal is a custom deal. Sometimes, that creates a little bit of a drag in terms of how fast we can move, but frankly our ability to be flexible and use different combinations of tools and we feel will be really helpful this year. So as I said, there's certainly big challenges over there. That said, I think there's a way to maneuver in that market and drive value. But it is definitely going to be -- I think, each customer will bring its own set of requirements and its own set of ways of dealing with them.

Eric Wold -- B. Riley & Co. -- Analyst

Thank you. And then just one follow-up. As you think about 5G, now that standards are set, your position is set. You kind of have some sense of timing, maybe -- I don't know how you want to address this. Maybe -- where are you with the handset operators assigned so far? What percentage of either customer base or the revenue base. How you want to frame it? What percentage is already covered by 5G kind of amendments where you're covered by 5G rollout versus once if you have to go back and amend the license to add 5G? And how much incremental, on average, do you think 5G could have with -- excluding any kind of benefit from Technicolor kind of moving on the mix, just the cellular alone? 5G kind of be added with 2G, 3G probably being lesser value. What's kind of the expected rise in value from this contract as 5G is rolled in?

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So generally, I think when we look at 5G, we look at it as really two things, right. The first is sustaining the current licensing businesses that we have. And so you're right. I mean, in a traditional sense, technology can -- value can erode over time, but -- when a new layer of technology comes in, that lifts up the value. It lifts it up for a couple of reasons because not only can the royalty rate excel, assisted by the new technology coming in, but the selling price of devices are going up. I don't know if you saw the -- there's a free announcement from Mobile World Congress in terms of Samsung's 5G phone and what the cost of the headphone is.

So ultimately, I think that if you look at the core business, and that's the handset licensing business, 5G, in my mind sustains that business and allows it to kind of move with the market, which is really good, because that's a really good, solid business, right. The word 5G I think has more growth potential for us, in how it contributes to the other markets that we talk about. So IoT is an example. I think 5G is the enabler that consist -- it's a technology enabler for that market. 5G also is going to penetrate the home more so than any other technology. So it drives value in the consumer electronics space. So I think that's where you see new value being created versus on the handset side. While there may be a bump on the technologies initially introduced with the handset prices go up, over time, that business is just going to be sustained by those different layers of technology. It's things like the Technicolor agreement that bring in added value on top of that.

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

So let me add a couple of things on that. So I think it's still worth reiterate that, it's only a couple of first releases of 5G that are out there and there's going to be multiple more. Also, with the new handsets -- 5G handsets out, that's the -- kind of the handset piece of it, but there is going to be the low latency, which is the applications like cars. And then there is going to be the IoT releases and IoT (inaudible) 5G. So there's the other aspect of 5G is much broader market than what just really a wireless handsets such as the 3G and 4G have been.

Operator

Our next question comes from Anja Marie Soderstrom from Sidoti & Company.

Anja Marie Soderstrom -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Hi gentlemen. Thank you for taking my questions. So I just have a few questions. The first on the Technicolor. As you are upselling those contracts, is there a chance to catch up payment like you have with others for unused use of the licenses there as well?

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So typically with -- I think with the -- most of the opportunities we're seeing in the acquired Technicolor licensing business, there is opportunity for catch-up. There are licenses there that -- more people have been on licensing and would be a renewal without that. But generally, I think there's a reasonable opportunity to get some catch-up payments there.

Anja Marie Soderstrom -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you. And then I noticed in your 10-K that Huawei now is less than 10% of your revenues for 2018 versus, what, 14% in 2017. Can you speak a little bit about that composition on your revenue mix among your largest customers?

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, sure. That was a result of our adoption of 606 at the beginning of the year. So the Huawei agreement was obviously entered in as a result of the arbitration a little bit of the unique path to get to an agreement and it resulted in terms that are a little bit different than what you'd expect for top three manufacturer and different -- frankly -- would expect even on renewal. So it was what we call static agreement in terms of the capture rights under the agreement. And we couldn't spread the -- continue to spread the revenue post adoption 606 on January 1, '18.

Anja Marie Soderstrom -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Okay, thank you. That was helpful. That's all from me.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from Scott Searle from Roth Capital.

Scott Searle -- Roth Capital. -- Analyst

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Hey, Rich just quickly to follow-up on Charlie's question earlier related to the $12.6 million in one-time charges. Could you give us some idea about how that kind of breaks down through some of the different OpEx items, line items? And additionally Chordant now spun off as a joint venture. Could you just give us a brief overview of the accounting related to that? I assume in joint venture, you're still controlling it. So it's on a fully consolidated basis and you are taking one line item out or how are you treating that from an accounting standpoint? And I have a couple of follow-ups.

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

Sure. I'll start with Chordant. So for accounting purposes we're still deemed to be the primary beneficiary and therefore are -- where bottom line we're still consolidating it. So that still shows up in our P&L from a cost perspective. And then on the question on one-time items, you referenced $12 million, I think you were probably pointing at least to the press release that we disclosed. We had $12.6 million of transaction integration or amortization expenses. That defers from my description in my script of $8 million, which was just transaction and integration. The delta between the two is the added non-cash amortization of the Chordant, the asset value for the portfolio we acquired. And then of the $8 million that's where you get a mix of some of that balance sheet true-ups that I talked about as well as integration costs.

Scott Searle -- Roth Capital. -- Analyst

Got you. Okay. Helpful. And just a follow-up on the Technicolor comments. Bill, I think you mentioned in your comments related to the relationship now with Technicolor, some rights and exclusivity in terms of purchasing that. Are there any areas that are not open to you now in terms of taking over the R&I Division of the pending R&I transaction? And also in the original press release, I think there was some mentions of some things other than video, specifically I think machine learning, AI, VR, AR were in there as well. Is that a big component of the opportunity then that we're seeing within the R&I development team?

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

So certainly artificial intelligence, machine learning are very important skills and capabilities for us as an organization to have. So we had some. It's a tough panel to recruit. It's a very popular talent out there, but it's one of those talents that we think long-term is going to be important both in terms of how technology is developed within video and wireless, but also the technology is ultimately deployed in terms of that capability being resonant in the technology. So it was certainly one of the attraction of the R&I team. I would tell you that the teams has got many, many attractions. It's a really really capable team. In terms of the transaction itself being one of the benefit of the transaction is actually, it simplified the relationship between the companies and reduce restrictions. And so we feel like all of the business opportunities that we want to pursue that business, the acquisition fully enables those opportunities.

Having Technicolor as a customer was an important component I think for both companies. The fact that Technicolor does some amazing things as we all see in theaters, in terms of how they help the directors produce films and how they bring all the various animations to life and that's -- what's behind that is some incredible technology development and it's very much a leading edge type of development because it's in the first place these things appear. And so being able to work with them and work with their teams on driving that innovation is important in providing a nice research compass to the organization. So it's a really, really exciting transaction, one that I think both sides are really, really thrilled that we've been able to put it together. And we'll work to close, but I think it provides a great strategic benefit to both companies.

Scott Searle -- Roth Capital. -- Analyst

And lastly, Bill, if I could. You did certainly have some comments in and around engaging with the Chinese OEMs and the current geopolitical climate aside. Do you continue to see more and more of the Chinese looking for exports as the domestic market is has come under some pressure and a lot of those announcements have been coming out more recently as we're going into more of the European marketplace for some of the larger Chinese OEMs, not uncommon for this time of year, right ahead of Mobile World Congress, but I'm wondering how is Europe looking at in enforcing intellectual property on these fronts? Where do they stand from an injunction standpoint and other license? Is that really playing into your hands and giving more of a heightened sense of urgency from a Chinese OEMs standpoint or to be determined enough and there is really change at this point in time? Thanks.

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. Well look it's a positive development. I mean, one, we always love to see our customers succeed and respect the customers. So to the extent that they're able to extend their operations, that's great. It tells you that the standard is doing its job in terms of enabling really stronger business. I think Europe is obviously a very mature market from an intellectual property standpoint. The rules are pretty well defined over there. I think there's very -- if there's a need for enforcement, there are available mechanisms for enforcement. And so all in -- that is just all good -- it's all good for us in terms -- if we need to go down that path. But frankly, I think that beyond the fact that these customers have been able to expand their market position reflects on the power provider of the standard.

Scott Searle -- Roth Capital. -- Analyst

Okay, thank you.

Operator

Our final question comes from Matthew Galinko with National Securities.

Matthew Galinko -- National Securities -- Analyst

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. So you touched on the difficulty of running, I think, a product and licensing business under one roof in the -- in your initial commentary. Curious about in forms or strategy of kind of (inaudible) holding initiatives like Chordant under the InterDigital umbrella directly?

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I think it does. I mean, if you think about it -- if you own the set of skills that you need to run product business is a different set of skills than what you need to run a research and licensing business. Second, to the extent that you're approaching the same customer with -- from both sides, that can create confusion and conflict at that customer. And frankly, we saw that with the -- when we did the original Technicolor transaction, that is actually the reason we spread gates, providing (inaudible) is happy because they have that conflict. So I think we -- you learn over time what you're really good at. You want to focus on what you're really good at it. I think we've done a really good job with things like Chordant and XCellAir and other options of taking -- of incubating new businesses, but we also know when we need to let them go and move out on their own. And that's essentially what we've done with Chordant. It's great to have Sony as an investor there because they obviously bring value, and we actually think that they can do really well, but they will be able to do better operating outside of the InterDigital envelope. We consolidated them up. They're running as an independent entity and we think that that's a much better structure for them and for us.

Matthew Galinko -- National Securities -- Analyst

Got it. And I think did mention an engagement between Chordant and (inaudible). Can you touch at all on what that means for that, that business. I'm trying to try to remember if there was a previous commercial engagement I can't think of any. So I was hoping you could expand on that a little bit?

Kai Oistamo -- Chief Operating Officer

The question is specifically on Chordant?

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

And DT.

Kai Oistamo -- Chief Operating Officer

And DT. So as you know Chordant provides the software platform or services platform on top of which mobile operators can build their own IoT business. And that's basically, I will say, the first major operator success that we've had with Chordant on actually bringing that promise to life where DT will build their own IoT business on -- kind of on top of the Chordant platform. We've kind of engaged in multiple other ones as well and obviously, that kind of early successes have been more of a -- with kind of public entities like in U.K., different counties and then so on.

Matthew Galinko -- National Securities -- Analyst

Great, thank you.

Operator

Thank you. And this concludes today's question-and-answer session. I will now turn the conference back over to Mr. Patrick Van de Wille.

Patrick Van de Wille -- Chief Communications Officer

Thanks very much, Bernie. And just to note, we'll be in Barcelona next week for Mobile World Congress, which as most people know, is the Super Bowl for our industry. It's an exciting time for us because a lot of the products that are rolling out this year are 5G, and they'll be implementing some of the things that we've been demonstrating over the last five or six years. It's great to see those technologies finally come to market. We will be demonstrating some exciting technology of our own. They will be featured on the website and we'll also be hosting some very interesting live-streamed discussions on various technologies. So I invite you all to check out the website and we'll be sending some email updates and also updating the website as well. So please join us next week for a look at Mobile World Congress and we look forward to speaking again next quarter. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you, everyone. This concludes today's teleconference. You may now disconnect.

Duration: 48 minutes

Call participants:

Patrick Van de Wille -- Chief Communications Officer

William J. Merritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Kai Oistamo -- Chief Operating Officer

Richard J. Brezski -- Chief Financial Officer

Charles Anderson -- Dougherty & Company -- Analyst

Eric Wold -- B. Riley & Co. -- Analyst

Anja Marie Soderstrom -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Scott Searle -- Roth Capital. -- Analyst

Matthew Galinko -- National Securities -- Analyst

More IDCC analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Thursday, February 21, 2019

LeMaitre Vascular inc (LMAT) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

LeMaitre Vascular inc  (NASDAQ:LMAT)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 19, 2019, 5:00 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Welcome to LeMaitre Vascular Fourth Quarter 2018 Financial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. JJ Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer of LeMaitre Vascular. Please go ahead, sir.

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

Thank you, Ashley. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us on our Q4 2018 conference call. With me on today's call is our Chairman and CEO, George LeMaitre; and our President, Dave Roberts.

Before we begin, I'll read our safe harbor statement. Today, we will make some forward-looking statements within the meaning of the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the accuracy of which is subject to risks and uncertainties. Wherever possible, we will try to identify those forward-looking statements by using words such as believe, expect, anticipate, pursue, forecast and similar expressions. Our forward-looking statements are based on our estimates and assumptions as of today, February 19th, 2019, and should not be relied upon as representing our estimates or views on any subsequent date.

Please refer to the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information in the risk factors in our most recent 10-K and subsequent SEC filings, including disclosure of the factors that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied.

During this call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which include organic sales and growth numbers and EBITDA, as well as return on invested capital and operating income growth expectations, excluding certain one-time gains. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures discussed in this call is contained in the associated press release, and is available in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.lemaitre.com.

I'll now turn the call over to George LeMaitre.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, JJ.

We posted record sales of $28.4 million in Q4, a 9% increase year-over-year. This was largely the result of our sales rep surge, our two recent acquisitions and a 79% quarter in Asia Pacific. We ended the year with 108 sales reps versus 90 at the end of 2017, a 20% increase. This increase was spread across our three major geographies, the Americas, EMEA and APAC. As we look to 2019, we intend to maintain roughly this level of sales reps. We also promoted a 15 year LeMaitre veteran, Chance Kriesel, to the position of VP, Sales for the Americas. In January, we began our worldwide installation of Salesforce.com.

Our two recent acquisitions, Applied's embolectomy business and Cardial, contributed $1.9 million of sales in Q4. We acquired these products because they are complementary to our current catheter, valvulotome and Dacron graft product lines. They should be nice vascular plug-in acquisitions right out of the LeMaitre playbook. These two acquisitions had sales of about $6.9 million in the year prior to their acquisitions.

Asia-Pac sales were driven by 68% organic growth as well as the acquired embolectomy catheters. In Q4, we also established our APAC headquarters in Singapore. On the XenoSure regulatory front, we obtained Australian approval in September. We have 224 of our 288 patients enrolled in the Chinese clinical trial and we file for Japanese approval in December.

From a product perspective, carotid shunt, surgical glue and embolectomy catheters were our top performers in Q4, while XenoSure grew 4% organically -- excuse me, 5% organically. As a follow-up to the Q3 earnings call, our allograft business posted a record Q4 and grew 18% and we made significant progress with tissue supply. Valvulotomes also bounced back in Q4 to post a record quarter.

I expect our 9% Q4 sales growth to extend into 2019 as reflected in our 8% sales guidance.

With that, I'll turn it over to JJ.

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

Thanks, George.

Our Q4 2018 gross margin was 67.7%, down 2.1% versus the prior year period. This was driven primarily by the addition of lower gross margin Cardial and Applied sales and the subtraction of higher gross margin Reddick sales. We did this to further focus our call point on the vascular surgeon. This new, lower gross margin may persist for several quarters while we execute integration and cost cutting measures typical after our acquisitions. As a reminder, the Reddick general surgery divestiture was in April 2018.

We ended Q4 with $48 million in cash, an increase of $2.4 million during the quarter. The increase was driven by cash from operations of $6.6 million in the quarter. For the full year, we generated $19.5 million in cash from operations. Excluding the one-time gains from the Reddick divestiture and Cardial acquisition, our return on invested capital was 20% in 2018.

Our Board of Directors recently approved a 21% increase in our quarterly dividends from $0.07 to $0.085, implying a yield of 1.4%. Our Board also authorized a share repurchase program of up to $10 million of our common stock.

Our guidance is detailed in the press release. Highlights include 8% reported and 5% organic sales growth for the full year 2019. We also expect full year operating income adjusted for one-time gains to improve 9% to $22.6 million at the midpoint.

With that I will turn it back over to the operator for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) And our first question comes from the line of Jason Mills with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is now open.

Cecilia Furlong -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

Hi, this is actually Cecilia on for Jason, and I just wanted to ask about the recent acquisitions and really what drove the strong Q4 performance, and then just looking at guidance for 2018, what your expectations for the business going forward, just quarterly cadence as well.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Okay. Lots in there. Maybe we'd break it down. Maybe Dave, you take the acquisition part of the question?

David B. Roberts -- President, Board Director

Sure. Thanks, Cecilia, for the question. Yeah, you're right to point out that the acquisitions that we completed on September 20th, the Applied acquisition and the Cardial acquisition we completed on October 22nd are coming in strong out of the gates. The two deals combined are running about 6% ahead of our deal model. Cardial, especially, is doing well. It's about 20% ahead of the model, and that was driven by -- we got really a few orders that we didn't expect that quickly. One was a glue order in the Middle East and then also some OEM orders that -- there is a small amount of OEM business at Cardial as well. But at a high level, the transition plan for both Cardial and for Applied, the channel transition is going very smoothly. There is one more material distributor to transition with Applied, and so we're just pleased that their performance in Q4 was better than we expected.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

And then, Cecilia, in terms of the quarter, there were a number of things that went well, and coming out of Q3, some of these are important as well. So we talked in Q3 about RestoreFlow being down 5% last quarter was an normally. It was up 18% this quarter. A nice rebound, and sequentially up $400,000 or $500,000. So a good story underneath that with RestoreFlow, sort of bump of Q3, still coming through in Q4 and hopefully into 2019 as well as we add new customers, as we plug that product line into our sort of 50 or so sales folks in the US. We talked about and valvulotomes, if you recall in Q3. And that was down a little bit as well, and sequentially a really nice rebound in valvulotomes, $4.5 million, maybe up to $5.5 million or so. So back on track if you will in valvulotomes. Our export was down in Q3 as well. A nice sequential rebound there. There is still an issue year-over-year with sort of growth topics there and we've talked a lot about those in the last two calls. So year-over-year comps in our non-direct sales still not great. Still working on those. We'll get to those and we'll fix those, but sequentially from Q3, a nice rebound. And so those topics really repaired nicely in Q4 versus Q3. And then on top of that, the acquired sales that Dave was talking about, really led to a nice strong Q4 to answer your question.

Cecilia Furlong -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

Okay, great (multiple speakers).

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Cecilia asked about cadence for the quarters also. So we -- at the beginning of the year, we usually don't break it out. I would say, as we we're going through selecting our guidance and looking at the quarters, it didn't seem like there was anything really that odd about this year. Typically, Q2 and Q4 are our largest quarters of the year.

Cecilia Furlong -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

Okay, thank you for all the color. And then just looking at OUS trends, specifically Asia-Pac, kind of what you're thinking going forward through 2019? I realize you don't break out specific sequential numbers, but just kind of overall trends, what you're seeing there and what you think you can do going forward.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Right. Maybe I'll look to history to answer that question because you're right, we're trying not to pull apart guidance into three regions. But I think when we were looking at this -- one of the reasons we're so excited about Asia-Pac is that if you look back over the last 10 years of our business, I think I'm quoting big numbers but I think organic growth is up like 11% a year for the last 10 years, whereas Europe is kind of 8% and the Americas is kind of 4% or 5%. So I think there's a material difference between Asia-Pac and the other two. It should be the place that grows the best. That's why you're seeing us build a Singapore office and start growing the sales force over there a little bit more.

Cecilia Furlong -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

Okay, great. Thank you for taking our questions.

Operator

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Joe Munda with First Analysis. Your line is now open.

Joe Munda -- First Analysis -- Analyst

Good afternoon, guys. Can you can hear me OK?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

We can, Joe.

Joe Munda -- First Analysis -- Analyst

So real quick, can you talk about your rep surge? You have 108. Can you give us a breakout? North America, Europe, rest of the world? And then your thoughts -- are you going to stick with the same size force going into '19 here? I'm guessing -- maybe you could give us some color on what your expectations are as a result of this recent surge and how it carries us over into '19.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Okay, great. So breakdown is the Americas -- or North America as you're putting it, 57 reps right now. That's up 24% year-over-year. Europe is, it's 38 reps. That's up 12% year-over-year. And Asia-Pac is 13 reps, which is up three people, which is up 30%. So the whole group of them as we mentioned, is up 20%. You have the guidance right now. We're saying 8% reported sales growth guidance. We think this is a pretty good foundation for that growth rate. But we don't know and -- we don't know really when they exactly come on. We just have a feeling things are getting a little better around here every day that we have these reps on. As far as how many reps we're are going to have for the year, it's at 108. We actually have eight or nine in the middle of being hired, but there's always what we call breakage, which is, some people coming some people going, and so maybe 110, 112,108 is kind of what you can think is going to be happening. But it will go up, and now we're not too focused on it. When we, quote, miss guidance and there's fewer reps than there should be, we don't get that worried about it when we overdo it, we don't get worried about that either. Something like 110 or so.

Joe Munda -- First Analysis -- Analyst

Okay. And then -- that's helpful. And then JJ, can you give us a split on how much biologics were as a percentage of sale in the quarter? And as a group, how much they were up?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

I think biologics were about 35% of sales in the quarter. And I think that was a 10% or so increase in the quarter, Joe. And we've got a new entrant in that category, the buyout, the glue that we acquired from Cardial is now in our biologic category as well.

Joe Munda -- First Analysis -- Analyst

Okay, OK.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) And our next question comes from the line of Mike Petusky with Barrington Research. Your line is now open.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

Hi, good evening, guys. A few questions. In terms of the valvulotome, what was the year-over-year comp on that? I didn't catch that, if you provided it.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Right. I think we didn't say it. We just said it was a record, but I'm happy to say -- I think it was up 2% organically, and it was a record quarter.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

Okay. And then -- just I want to confirm what I think I heard, was it 244 out of 288 are enrolled in the XenoSure trial in China?

David B. Roberts -- President, Board Director

Yes (multiple speakers).

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

224 of 288. 224.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

224 of 288. Got it. Thank you (inaudible). And then George, I guess in terms of the top line guidance, and I'm not asking you to go back to the 10 (ph) and 20 (ph), but just generally speaking, in the 8% top line, what's assumed therefore for pricing? And if there -- is there any M&A assumed in there for -- other than what's already -- the recent transactions?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Okay. So easily, the answer is no. There's never M&A in our guidance. We always just -- what we've already bought plus what we are. So, no. No M&A in that. And then as far as pricing goes, I would say we'll see what happens with pricing this year. But in general, it feels to me like LeMaitre is a 3% or 4% price hiker each year. I feel like it's been a little bit more challenged in the last couple of years and we used to be more like a 5% or 6% five years ago.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

Okay. All right. And obviously some positive unit volume assumption as well.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

And the balance is being unit volume, yeah.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

Yeah, OK. And then I guess JJ, in terms of getting at the efficiencies, and maybe this is just me not quite remembering correctly last few years. But it feels like you guys have been able to get at efficiencies usually quicker than maybe it seems like you're going to -- you're assuming that you'll get at efficiencies this time in terms of sort of taking the gross margin back toward 70%. Are these recent acquisitions just a little bit tougher to integrate or any comment around that?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

Yeah, there has been -- I think that typically when we do an acquisition that doesn't come with a facility and doesn't have a lot of sort of tribal knowledge or learning a new process or about a new product, things happen a lot quicker when we move that product line into our facility and off we go. In the case of allografts, that's a pretty complicated logistical challenge as it turns out, and we figured out a lot about that over the last year and a half or so. And so we're starting to improve that part of the equation, but it's taking longer than usual. I think that's the generally correct observation. And then with the recent two acquisitions, they're coming in at pretty low gross margins, in the sort of around the 40%-ish range or so, and so those will drag us down for a while until we figure out how to grapple with those. But I think you can bet that we'll be working on all of those pieces going forward, figuring how to -- figuring out how to get efficiencies out of those.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Mike, I think it's also germane that we have four factories outlying right now. And when you have four, you can't -- it's impossible to be closing four at the same time. So some of them necessarily are going to be open a little bit longer than you might want or you might think that we would -- that we would keep them open. So it's -- part of that is, hey, we just did two, therefore, you can't -- we don't have infinite bandwidth inside LeMaitre to close four factories at once.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

Got you, got you. And just last one on the sort of surprising recovery, particularly in terms of degree in allografts. It seems like you guys had sort of set expectations of hey, this may take a while to work through, there is customer losses, sourcing difficulties, but it -- it feels like really quick and sprang, bounced back. Are you guys on the other side of that or is that still tough to sort of work through?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

I feel like that -- certainly in the quarter that was a strong bounce back, and I think the big high level answer is still very much intact, which is we're acquiring new customers daily and the new larger sales force -- maybe we added 120 or more, sort of, since the acquisition, and that will essentially take over from that issue that we affected -- that we saw that affected us in Q3. But I would say, you might get a little chunkiness. Even though recovered really quickly in this quarter, maybe it's a little chunky here and there as we go through the year, next year, but I think the story high level over the next year is still intact as well, which is you can probably expect some decent growth out of that as we continue to grow that customer base.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

Okay. Very good. Thanks, guys. Really appreciate it.

Operator

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jim Sidoti with Sidoti & Company. You may proceed.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Hi, good afternoon. Can you hear me?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, we can.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Great, great. I just want to go over a couple of the numbers you put out before. You said Restore (ph) was at 18% in the industry. I think you said that was (ph) 5%. And then, did you give an overall number for the biologics business?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

Yeah, we said up 10%, Jim.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

10% overall?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

Yeah.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Okay. And you said you improved the situation with tissue supply. Can you give me a little more color around that?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. This one is a pretty clean cut one. I think I said this on call, but I forget. So we are having tissue supply problems. And you may remember I grew a beard to protest the back orders for our tissue. I think we talked about this the last time. I don't know. Well, the beard got shaved on January 23rd at our holiday party, and the beard was supposed to represent we want to make sure that we have 10 of the 70 centimeter devices available and 10 of the 80 centimeter devices available at all times for our reps. That had not been the case before the whole backorder beard project started. We think we're good to go on that part of the supply issue.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

All right. Thank god it was you and not JJ.

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

Thanks, Jim.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, hard to (inaudible) that.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

All right. You talked about the Asia-Pac office in Singapore. What, once approved right now, that you can sell in Asia?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

So that's always a big topic. The regulatory burdens are a lot heavier over there, but we're growing percentages. And on our website, there is a presentation that always shows what percent in each geography. So I'm going to talk out of memory, but you can go find it after you get off the call. I think in Japan, about 55% of our sales are approved. I think in Australia, about 83% of our sales are approved. And I think in China, about 25% of our sales were approved. So in other words, of all the catalog numbers we have, our Chinese sales reps, the four of them only can sell 24% or 25% of those catalog numbers. And so they're certainly hamstrung and there's great blue sky later for those folks. But in Australia, I'd say we largely have it going on. And then each country is different. There is no CE Mark for Asia. So then after that, each country is different, and it's a couple of them are detailed on the website.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

All right. And then the last couple -- it sounds like you expect a little over $5 million from the acquisitions in 2019. Now you said the sales -- 12 month trailing sales were close to about $7 million. Is the delta just the difference you did in the fourth quarter?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

I don't remember saying we're going to do $5 million for these products this coming year. Was that some kind of trick?

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

But it was in the press release.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Did we say that?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

I don't think we said that.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

You're on -- you're on the semi, small guidance that we gave at each press release when we bought the products. So that was the initial couple first three months. I think we guided, I don't know $550,000 for Applied Medical and I think we guided $300,000 for Cardial and those were just in the start-up quarter and that was all we gave, it was $550,000 and $300,000.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

All right. If you look on page seven in your press release, you have the net impact of acquisitions, excluding currency of $5.3 million.

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

So that's the organic -- or part of the organic growth calc, Jim. And so if you took an annualized number and then you adjusted it for when you acquired the product line. So you don't adjust out a full year for Applied because you bought it September, October, and you don't adjust that for full year. And so why it's lower than -- if you took them, the two of them and added them up for an annualized number, and you come up with whatever around $7 million bucks or so it's lower because you don't adjust out a full year for those. You adjust out as of when they were acquired.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Okay. Alright. So that's what I was saying. Because you did about $2 million revenue from those products in the fourth quarter.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, and that was a particularly strong year. So the first question of the call Dave answered and we got this huge order from Iraq related to one of the product lines. So it was a bit anomalous, I would say, in Q4 the revenues that we saw on the two acquisitions.

David B. Roberts -- President, Board Director

Yeah. I wouldn't -- Jim, it's Dave. I wouldn't necessarily take Q4 and multiply it by four, again because of the anomalous order to Iraq as well as some OEM business. But even without all that, we felt like it was a healthy start for the two acquisitions.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Okay. All right. And then last question. It looks like you expect about a $2 million currency headwind in '19. What currency there, I mean, the troublesome ones?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

The euro is the big bugaboo, so it was $1.18 or so for 2018 and we are now at $1.13 and change or so. So there's like a $1.5 million topic from that year-over-year. And then if you bring in the pound and the yen and the Canadian and whatever else, it gets you about $1.7 million or so. So having a stronger dollar and low interest rates in Europe. Jim.

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

All right. Thank you.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). And our next question comes from the line of Brooks O'Neil with Lake Street Capital. Your line is now open.

Brooks O'Neil -- Lake Street Capital -- Analyst

Hi guys. I have a couple of questions. I'm recognizing that there is a lot of moving parts from last year to this year. But how would you characterize kind of the organic EPS growth from 2018 to 2019 if you strip out kind of all the extraneous moving parts, the benefits and cost of acquisitions and stuff like that? How do you feel about the core earning power of the business that you're running today?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

Yeah, so -- if you strip out -- if you strip out the one-timers year-over-year for our guidance, the EPS growth is sort of flattish. And I would say a lot of the answer is in this gross margin topic. So those two recent acquisitions are probably a negative 2% bad guide of the gross margin in that range. And so that's $2 million plus that sort of otherwise would normally drop to the bottom line, it doesn't. If you added back that $2 million you come into a sort of more normalized year-over-year EPS growth numbers. So a lot of it is that. And then there is another piece, of course, which is op expenses. And I think we are thinking that they're going to be pretty well in check for 2019, but still growing. So if you're growing your op expenses 5%, 6% or something like that, and your, say, your top line is growing 8%, that's not a necessarily a ton of leverage, particularly when you run it through a lower gross margin. So that's kind of the dynamic of that of -- that answer. And I would say as we repair that gross margin over time that will certainly help and as we -- as these investments that we're making now and those operating expenses that I'm talking about start to bring on more sales growth potentially, we'll get good answers there as well on the bottom line.

Brooks O'Neil -- Lake Street Capital -- Analyst

It's great, JJ. And -- I was listening, but I might have forgotten the answer you said earlier. You think you can get that GM up somewhat in 2019 or will it take longer than that?

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

I would say I think about it as taking longer. We've guided 69.5% for the full year. So anything below 70 is not a great number for us. So I would say that's still in repair during the year.

Brooks O'Neil -- Lake Street Capital -- Analyst

Okay. And then -- again, I'm not meaning to pick at this, but I'm just curious if you strip out the impact of the acquisitions, would you say that you're entering 2019 with accelerating organic growth or is it coming in a little bit lighter than what we saw in the fourth quarter and during 2018?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Okay. So fourth quarter 2018 is a lot different than 2018 -- 2018, we had 3.8% organic growth, 4% as rounded. So, no, the 5% organic growth that we're quoting for next year, 2019 seems like an acceleration of organic growth.

Brooks O'Neil -- Lake Street Capital -- Analyst

Great, George. Thank you very much, and good luck this year.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Scott Henry with ROTH Capital. Your line is now open.

Scott Henry -- ROTH Capital -- Analyst

Thank you and good afternoon. Just a couple questions. First, did I hear you speak about XenoSure having roughly 5% organic growth?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, that was in the transcript.

Scott Henry -- ROTH Capital -- Analyst

Okay. And so my question is when we think about that, it's pretty large product in the portfolio. When we think about 2019, 5%, maybe another 3% for pricing, is it reasonable to think about that in the range of an 8% to 10% grower in 2019? I'm not trying to get too line item focused, but it is a new product.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

I know. Scott, we really do look at this as a mutual fund of devices. And so the 5% is for the whole portfolio. It is interesting you're bringing together -- I hadn't really put these together, but you're putting together, that it was a 5% grower in Q4 and then does it match the 5% maybe in next year 2019. I don't know. There's some logic to make net assumption, but I don't know. The product line was 17% in 2018 -- '17, excuse me, and then it was 6% organic in 2018. So there's no question it's decelerated a little bit. But to pull it out for next year, I don't think we'd be very good at doing that for you.

Scott Henry -- ROTH Capital -- Analyst

Okay. But I appreciate the color on that. And then just one other question. R&D has been trending at a higher rate in the past couple of quarters and into Q4. I guess the question is, could you talk a little bit about where that investment is going and what categories you're targeting?

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Sure, sure. So at a very high level we could just say the word XenoSure and then we could also say the CE Mark and the XenoSure side of this is you're hearing a big approval process going on in Japan right now. No clinical trials -- no human clinical trials. But it's a big process. It's just launched in December and you're hearing about the Chinese clinical trial, that we're in the middle of a human clinical trial over there. We are also pursuing approval in Korea and we just got approval in Australia. So a lot of this is regulatory, related to that. A lot of this is new products related to XenoSure. We've talked a little bit on these calls about XenoSure 2.0, our next-gen device. We've talked about XenoSure Dura which is a different indication that we're trying to pursue which other competitors have. And we've also talked about XenoSure fat guy (ph), which is a thicker device. So a lot of R&D and a lot of regulatory dollars which are classified as R&D dollars on your income statement. So there's that. So there is also CE Mark, which I think a lot of our competitors have talked about on their calls, which is the CE folks are moving to a much more serious system. I would say they used to be a little bit easier than the US FDA 10 years ago and it's clear to me that in three or four years, they're going to be harder than the US FDA in terms of approvals. Even things that you've already got approvals on, you've now got to go and prove that those actual devices do work in human beings. And so there's a lot of prospective studying that they're asking us to do and retrospective study they're asking us to do. All those things you're seeing come out as R&D dollars for LeMaitre. We're now at 8% of revenues in R&D dollars, and I feel like it was only five or eight quarters ago that we were at 6% R&D dollars. So some of the difficulties we're having in expanding our op margin are certainly related to that.

Scott Henry -- ROTH Capital -- Analyst

Okay, great. Thank you for taking the questions.

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. And we do have a follow-up question from the line of Mike Petusky with Barrington Research. Your line is now open.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

I figure I'd give Dave a shot to earn his pay here, get him involved. So, David, could you just talk about what you're seeing in terms of assets out there, pipeline for you guys, specifically pricing versus maybe what you're saying 12 to 18 months ago? Thanks.

David B. Roberts -- President, Board Director

Yeah, sure. So it's only-Mike, it's now been about four or five months since we completed those last two deals. And while on the one hand, we've been very focused on the integration, this big team inside of LeMaitre helping with that. Also, the deal team here, we've turned and started moving in the next play. So I would say at a high level without getting into details, the pipeline does look good, it looks robust. As you of course know we've done about a deal a year for a little over 20 years. So we always, I'd say, have a decent sized pipeline. In terms of valuations, I think there are a couple ways to look at it. One is public market valuations. If you look at the IHI medical device index, it's at its near all-time high. So public stocks -- medical device stocks are fairly high, and then in terms of deals that we see in this space, there was a property that traded in our space recently, Vascular Insights was acquired by Merit for about four times sales; if you include the earnout, it was about 6x. So I would say valuations are high, although normally LeMaitre is not participating in auctions and we're often in discussions with individual private companies and carve-outs. So it's very situational dependent. So in that respect, we are always very disciplined in terms of what we pay, and we've been like that in the past, and I would expect that we'll be like that for the foreseeable future as well.

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

All right. Very good. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. I would like to thank you for your participation. And you may now disconnect. Have a great day.

Duration: 34 minutes

Call participants:

Joseph P. Pellegrino -- Chief Financial Officer and Board Director

George W. LeMaitre -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Cecilia Furlong -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

David B. Roberts -- President, Board Director

Joe Munda -- First Analysis -- Analyst

Mike Petusky -- Barrington Research -- Analyst

Jim Sidoti -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Brooks O'Neil -- Lake Street Capital -- Analyst

Scott Henry -- ROTH Capital -- Analyst

More LMAT analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Advance Auto Parts (AAP) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble with words 'Fool Transcripts' below it

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Advance Auto Parts (NYSE:AAP) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 19, 2019 8:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Welcome to the Advance Auto Parts fourth-quarter 2018 conference call. Before we begin, Elisabeth Eisleben, vice president, investor relations, will make a brief statement concerning forward-looking statements that will be discussed on this call.

Elisabeth Eisleben -- Vice President, Investor Relations

Good morning, and thank you for joining us to discuss our fourth-quarter and full-year 2018 results. I'm joined by Tom Greco, our president and chief executive officer; and Jeff Shepherd, our executive vice president, chief financial officer, controller and chief accounting officer. Following their prepared remarks, we will turn our attention to answering your questions. Before we begin, please be advised that our comments today may include forward-looking statements, as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

All actual results may differ materially from those projected in such statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties which are described in the Risk Factors section in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We maintain no duty to update forward-looking statements made. Additionally, our comments today include certain non-GAAP financial measures. We believe providing these measures helps investors gain a more complete understanding of our results and is consistent with how management views our financial results.

Please refer to our quarterly press release and accompanying financial statements issued today for additional detail regarding the forward-looking statements and reconciliations to these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures referenced in today's call. The content of this call will be governed by the information contained in our earnings release and related financial statements. Now let me turn the call over to Tom Greco.

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Elisabeth. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today to discuss our fourth-quarter and full-year 2018 results. This was an exciting year for Advance, and I want to personally thank the entire Advance team and our network of Carquest independents for their unwavering commitment, focus and dedication to deliver meaningful progress toward our long-term strategic objectives throughout the year. In the fourth quarter, net sales increased 3.3% to $2.1 billion and comparable store sales were up 3.4%.

Our adjusted operating income margin of 6% increased 45 basis points compared to the prior-year quarter. And our adjusted earnings per share increased 51.9% to $1.17. Regarding our full-year 2018 performance, our net sales increased 2.2% to $9.6 billion, and we delivered a 2.3% increase in comparable store sales, our strongest annual growth rate since the acquisition of GPI. Adjusted operating income margin increased 51 basis points year over year to 7.8%, and our free cash flow was $617 million, an increase of $206 million year over year.

Jeff will speak to our financial results for the quarter and the full year in more detail shortly. The continuous improvement we delivered throughout 2018 would not have been possible without our more than 70,000 team members truly living our cultural beliefs every day and reinforcing our mission: Passion for customers, passion for yes. The hard work we've completed to date is building the foundation we need to win over the long term. Specifically, in the fourth quarter, I'm very pleased with the consistent, balanced improvement throughout AAP on nearly every metric.

Both our North and South divisions delivered positive comp sales, with geographical growth led by our mid-Atlantic, Carolinas, Gulf Coast, Appalachian and Northeast regions. From a category perspective, we saw strong sales in brakes, engine management, oil and filters and under car. As we discussed last quarter, we're seeing meaningful improvements in key metrics across the enterprise, driving growth in both our Professional and DIY businesses. In the fourth quarter, for the first time in recent history, our DIY business out-comped the Professional business as our omnichannel initiatives continue to strengthen our customer value proposition for DIYers.

Turning to Professional, we delivered growth across all Professional businesses in both the fourth-quarter and full-year 2018, led by growth in Worldpac and our Carquest independents. We remain focused on our commitment to deliver a best-in-class experience for our Professional customers. With this objective front and center, we're building new capabilities to strengthen our partnerships with customers, ensuring future success for both their business and AAP. For example, with the launch of our unified Professional portal, MyAdvance, in August, we're integrating multiple formerly disparate online tools in a one-stop shop.

This includes our Advance Pro catalog, e-services suite, training resources, customer support and many other value-added tools for Professional customers. As a result, usage of this platform increased over 50% in Q4. This unique Advance tool differentiates us from our competitors and provides a single location for our industry-leading product assortment, as well as training and business solution advice. Expanding on our DIY omnichannel performance, we made significant investments in our online engagement and fulfillment platforms to further enhance the customer experience.

We improved customer engagement by increasing page load speed, streamlining search capabilities and increasing customizations based on customers' vehicles and search inputs. We're also leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to improve our online attachment selling, as well as product assortment. The significant investments we're making in our website are enabling improved customer confidence that they are getting the right part for the job. If they buy online and pick up in store, our knowledgeable team members are available to provide trusted advice to our customers and ensure they have the complete and correct parts to get the job done.

Aligned with our omnichannel focus, we're excited about the progress we've made with our recently announced Walmart partnership, which will significantly extend our reach to DIY customers and help drive market share growth for AAP. We've appointed a senior leader to lead the partnership, and we're building a talented team to work together with our Walmart partners to launch and grow this business. We're off to a strong start, with the AAP and Walmart team members working well together and focused on delivering a compelling value proposition for DIYers. We're on track to begin rolling out our plans in the first half of this year.

This will include the launch of a broad assortment of our industry-leading parts. Customers will be able to have the parts shipped to their home in the first phase of the rollout, while phase two will enable buy online and pick up today in an Advance store. Finally, last year, we introduced three key elements of our end-to-end supply chain and footprint optimization strategy. First, a market-by-market approach to drive share; second, repurposing our in-market store and asset base; and third, optimizing our distribution centers.

Overall, I'm pleased with the progress we've made to improve our footprint over the last year. We're improving share performance through our market-by-market approach, which in 2018, included 14 new Worldpac branch openings. We expect to continue this momentum in '19 to further strengthen our Customer Value Proposition and gain share. In addition, we closed and consolidated 101 stores during 2018.

Consistent with previous quarters, we're approaching store closures very differently than in the past. Most importantly, our team is laser-focused on retaining our top-performing team members and ensuring that we maintain sales through the transfer to other AAP locations. Regarding optimizing our distribution centers, I'm pleased with our team's successful execution in closing our Gallman and San Antonio distribution centers in 2018. We're in the process of closing our Columbia, South Carolina distribution center and are on track to complete this in the first half of 2019.

We're thrilled with Reuben Slone joining our leadership team as we continue to make progress on supply chain. While we have significant opportunities to improve supply chain execution, we did increase transparency and collaboration between supply chain and other functions, such as store operations and merchandising. We also rolled out new tools and technology in the fourth quarter, including our delivery dashboard, which leverages telematics and improves accuracy and reliability of Pro delivery for our customers. In summary, I'm confident in the supply chain team's ability to further improve execution in 2019 and deliver on our long-term goals, including the optimization of our entire distribution network.

Finally, I'm pleased to report we published our inaugural Corporate Sustainability and Social Report in December and posted it on our website. This report highlights our progress in three primary areas within our ESG agenda: people, planet and community. Once again, we made progress on people and culture in 2018 as we further increased diversity representation in leadership roles. We continued to invest in frontline team members through our field to front line incentive program, with more than 15,000 grants to date.

Field to front line remains a unique program within our industry and broader retail. There's no question that this has been a driver of increased retention of our top performers in key store operations positions. We also appointed a world-class environmental, health and safety leader, Mike Miller. Mike's built a talented team and launched several safety initiatives, driving meaningful improvements, including a 10% reduction in the number of reportable incidents and an additional 13% reduction in our collision frequency rate.

In terms of environmental, we reduced our greenhouse gas emissions by 7%. Long term, we expect our environmental, health and safety agenda will drive significant productivity. In terms of community, we elevated our involvement in our communities by playing leadership roles in national organizations, such as JDRF; the American Heart Association; and Building Homes for Heroes, an organization who constructs new homes for veterans and their families returning to the U.S. While we've delivered progress in each of these critical areas to date, we recognize we have a responsibility to do more.

I look forward to continuing our momentum and sharing future updates on these efforts. In summary, performance improvements across the enterprise in 2018 translated to accelerated growth. As we said previously, we continue to be encouraged by the improving macro indicators for the auto parts industry and are confident in our ability to deliver top-line growth, margin expansion and strong cash flow in 2019. With that, I'll turn it over to Jeff for details on our financial performance and our 2019 outlook.

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Thanks, Tom, and good morning, everyone. I want to begin by thanking the entire Advance team for their dedication throughout 2018. In Q4, the team's discipline enabled meaningful improvement across the business. Our adjusted gross profit was $930 million, an increase of 6.4% from the prior-year quarter.

On a rate basis, our adjusted gross profit margin of 44.2% improved by 127 basis points from the prior-year quarter. The drivers of this increase was a result of productivity initiatives, including MCO, inventory efforts to better position existing inventory throughout our supply chain and reduce shrink. These improvements were partially offset by commodity and tariff headwinds versus the prior-year quarter. The good news is we see minimal impact on units as a result of commodity and tariff-related cost increases.

And to date, we've been successful passing on any increases through pricing actions. We continue to work closely with our supplier partners to negotiate pricing and minimize impacts to our customers. Our adjusted SG&A was $802 million in the fourth quarter, an increase of $43 million year over year. As a percentage of net sales, our adjusted SG&A increased by 82 basis points to 38.1%.

The majority of this increase was driven by higher bonus expense, which we expect to normalize in 2019. We also increased spending related to our new marketing campaign, including an acceleration of digital capabilities. Additionally, our last mile delivery expenses were higher due to increased fuel and transportation expenses, which include increased costs related to cross-banner visibility. While this capability is clearly enabling stronger top-line performance, we have significant opportunity to improve efficiency.

And finally, third-party services and contract fees were higher in the quarter, directly correlated to the increased capital spend. These headwinds were partially offset by further reduction in our insurance and claims expenses due to improved safety performance, as well as lower rent and occupancy cost. Adjusted operating income in the fourth quarter was $127 million, an 11.7% increase from the fourth quarter of 2017. Our adjusted operating income margin increased 45 basis points to 6% in the quarter.

Consistent with the quarterly ramp in capital spending throughout 2018, our CAPEX in Q4 was $89 million, bringing our full-year spend to $194 million. More than 65% of Q4 spend was related to information technology and supply chain projects. Our IT initiatives include critical system investments, addressing long-standing integration opportunities and lack of capabilities. We've officially started the integration of all banners and moved to a single payroll system on January 1st.

Our finance team also launched our ERP project to integrate our back-office systems, which will happen over the next two years. As Reuben and his team work to improve existing supply chain operations, we invested in network upgrades, including wireless access and handheld scanners to improve accuracy and efficiencies within the distribution centers. For the full-year 2018, net sales were $9,581,000,000, an increase of 2.2% compared to 2017. And comp sales were 2.3%, a significant improvement over our 2017 performance.

Adjusted gross profit for the year increased 3.5% to $4.2 billion and adjusted gross profit margin increased 53 basis points to 44.1%. Adjusted SG&A for the year increased 2.3% to $3.5 billion. On a rate basis, our full-year adjusted SG&A was 36.3%, which was flat year over year and in line with previously discussed expectations. We delivered a 9.3% increase in adjusted operating income for the full year to $750.2 million.

Adjusted operating income margin was 7.8%, an increase of 51 basis points. Full-year operating cash flow increased by $210 million to $811 million. And free cash flow improved by $206 million to $617 million. Because of several factors, we increased inventory more than originally planned in 2018, resulting in free cash flow slightly below our November projection.

The primary drivers for the increase year over year in addition to higher sales were, first, as we are beginning to implement dynamic assortment, we found some gaps in our current coverage. Consistent with our commitment to putting the customer first, we increased inventory purchases in Q4 to mitigate these gaps and potential risk to the successful rollout of dynamic assortment in Q1. Dynamic assortment will significantly improve how we forward-deploy inventory, and expect that when fully implemented, will enable higher turns. Second, as sales trended higher, we were focused on improving store in-stocks, resulting in higher purchases to ensure replenishment capabilities throughout our supply chain.

Third is related to 14 new Worldpac branches that were opened in 2018, as well as purchases to support planned openings in the first quarter of 2019. With all that said, we remain committed to optimizing our inventory over the next several years while maintaining our customer-first focus and improving our assortment across the enterprise. Our disciplined approach to managing cash and delivering on our capital allocation priorities this year resulted in an AP ratio of 72.7% to end 2018, an improvement of 329 basis points year over year. In addition to this notable progress, we delivered a 13.8% return on invested capital, which was a 90-basis-point improvement compared to the prior year.

In line with our financial priorities to maintain an investment grade rating, invest in the business and opportunistically return capital to shareholders, we repurchased $153 million worth of Advance stock during the fourth quarter. We're confident in our ability to generate cash flow from the business and committed to the opportunistic return of cash to shareholders. As such, subsequent to year end, we repurchased $127 million worth of Advance stock at an average price of $159.65. Our guidance and forecast do not include any additional repurchases at this time.

Additionally, last month, we announced the early redemption of our $300 million 2020 notes using available cash on hand. We're confident in our ability to generate cash flow from the business and drive shareholder value while keeping to our financial priorities. We are pleased with what we are able to deliver in both the fourth quarter and full year, but recognize that we still have work to do to capitalize on the significant opportunity ahead. As we continue the disciplined execution of our strategic objectives in 2019, we're confident we will deliver further improvements this year.

In 2019, we expect to deliver net sales of $9.65 billion to $9.8 billion with comparable store sales in the range of 1% to 2.5%. We expect adjusted operating income margin expansion in a range of 20 to 60 basis points, which includes operating expenses related to a continued ramp in investments in IT, supply chain and marketing in a range of $80 million to $120 million in 2019. We estimate our CAPEX in the range of $250 million to $300 million this year, of which, more than two thirds is focused on technology, e-commerce and supply chain investments. In line with our continuing transformation agenda in 2019, we estimate integration and transformation expenses of $80 million to $100 million this year, which includes approximately $15 million related to further optimization of our store footprint.

Our 2019 tax rate is expected to be 24% to 26%. Finally, we remain disciplined in our cash management and focus on improving cash flow. For 2019, we expect to deliver minimum free cash flow of $650 million. In summary, from a financial perspective, we're pleased with where we ended 2018.

But as Tom said, we need to continue our momentum to remain laser-focused on flawless execution in the short term while making the appropriate investments in both CAPEX and OPEX to deliver our long-term objectives. We're optimistic about 2019 and look forward to sharing future successes as we continue executing on our strategic plan. With that, let's open it up to addressing your questions. Operator? 

Questions and Answers:

Operator

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from Simeon Gutman with Morgan Stanley.

Xian Siew -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

This is Xian Siew on for Simeon. So guidance sounds maybe a little bit conservative, and you've talked about mid-teens EBIT margins over time, which would represent significant gains from here. A range of 20 to 60 is encouraging. But we were just kind of wondering if the journey may be taking -- going to take a little bit longer to reach over time.

Or should we expect faster progress at some point in?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, we feel pretty good about the progress we made in 2018 in driving top-line growth and expanding margins at the same time. This is something that the old AAP had difficulty with, and we're happy that we were able to do both last year. The productivity focus in '18 drove margin expansion in '18, and we feel that the material cost optimization, supply chain productivity and zero-based budgeting will continue to help us with the productivity. There are some offsetting investments in 2019 which will limit margin expansion.

And we feel these investments are critical to our success and they're going to really differentiate us over the long term. They will do one of two things: They will either unlock future cost savings or drive top-line growth. And in our prepared remarks, you heard Jeff talk about a range of $80 million to $120 million of OPEX investment in 2019. That, by itself, is around a full point of margin expansion in '19 that we're reinvesting back in the business in order to drive long-term growth.

They're focused in three areas, the OPEX investments. First of all, technology and e-commerce; secondly, in our people, primarily in supply chain; and third, in marketing. And I'm happy to go deeper into each of these areas, but the net of it is, in 2019, we'll drive significant productivity and expand margins and drive our top-line growth while making important, necessary investments to drive the long-term growth of the company.

Xian Siew -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

And then just a follow-up to that. Can you just remind us where the biggest upside will come from? Longer term, what's the biggest kind of opportunity? Is it in efficiency on the margins or more of the sales productivity?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, we obviously have both. I mean, we think we can drive shareholder value through a combination of performing at or above the rate of growth of the industry, which is very healthy right now in that 3% range. And we also believe we can drive significant margin expansion. So both of those play a key role in the overall trajectory of our financials.

Operator

Our next question comes from Chris Horvers with JPMorgan.

Chris Horvers -- J.P. Morgan -- Analyst

Can you talk about the margin guide for this year? How should we be thinking about the cadence? Do you think it's going to be more front half versus back half weighted? You'd have to annualize some investments and expenses from last year, this past year, as well. And in terms of the components, how should we think about gross margin leverage versus SG&A?

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Yes, Chris. We think overall for the year, the margin's going to be -- we're going to see steady improvement throughout the year. In terms of the margin breakdown between SG&A and gross margin, we think we're going to be flat on a rate basis on our SG&A. So as you recall, in 2018, we came in at 36.3%.

Right now, we're modeling, with those OPEX investment that we talked about in both our prepared remarks and the color we just gave on the previous question that that will keep us flat on a rate basis. So that's the way we're thinking about it.

Chris Horvers -- J.P. Morgan -- Analyst

Understood. And then in terms of the share repurchase opportunity, can you sort of square up how you think about that use of free cash flow? You have the debt paydown coming, $300 million in the first quarter. How do you think about the opportunity for share repurchases in 2019?

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Yes. And just to remind you, our capital allocation priorities, they have remained unchanged from 2018, which is: To maintain that investment grade rating; reinvest in the business, we talked about the increase in the capital expenditures we expect in 2019 which is going to be a range of $250 million to $300 million; and then opportunistically repurchasing shares or giving excess cash back to our shareholders. Since we had our revised repurchase plan, we've repurchased $400 million worth of shares, and we're going to continue to be opportunistic with that. We don't have anything in our guidance currently, but we're going to continue to be opportunistic and look at those opportunities to return excess cash to our shareholders.

Chris Horvers -- J.P. Morgan -- Analyst

Understood. And then the last question. Tom, can you talk about how you're thinking about the supply chain integration? You have multiple phases, I think three phases, going on currently. How do you think about the time to complete those different supply chain projects?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure, Chris. Well, Reuben Slone, as you know, came in, in the fourth quarter. And Reuben was on our board. He has brought a new dimension to our thinking.

He was very familiar with what we were doing. I think he's really building momentum to ramp up execution in our supply chain. He's focused on a very rigorous standardization of the core processes. So it's important to note that I feel really good about the progress we're making on the execution, just the basic blocking and tackling within our supply chain.

The three big elements of our supply chain strategy haven't changed, to your point. The first one is building a market-by-market DMA plan. And I think we've completed a thorough review of every market in the country. We plan to leverage really the entire enterprise's supply chain infrastructure.

The goal here is to drive share, obviously; expand our margin; drive cash flow for each market, based on the size of the opportunity going forward within our existing footprint. Secondly, you've heard us talk about DC optimization. We have more DCs than we need. We're in the process of executing a pretty disciplined plan to optimize the network.

We completed the closures of our Gallman and San Antonio DC at the end of 2018. And we're on track to close our Columbia, South Carolina DC during the first half of 2019. And you'll see us continue this optimization work going forward. Finally, in terms of our in-store -- in-market store and asset optimization, this is also well under way and it's performing very well.

Here, we look at the entirety of the end market asset base, including Advance and Carquest DCs; Advance super hubs and hubs; Worldpac branches; Autopart International stores; and of course, our Advance and Carquest stores, both corporate and independent. And once we're clear on what the entirety of these asset base is and how to best assort and connect these assets, we then look to optimize. And with this as a backdrop, we did a great job executing store closures last year. We're exceeding the goals we established across the board.

And in 2018, we closed and consolidated 101 stores and opened about 14 Worldpac branches. So we plan to take a similar approach in 2019, and I feel really good about how we're executing, and I'm confident it's going to get better under Reuben's leadership.

Operator

Our next question comes from Michael Lasser with UBS.

Michael Lasser -- UBS -- Analyst

As you look out over the longer run, do you expect the DIY and DIFM business to be more similar in terms of growth rate? And why do you think the -- what drove the difference this quarter?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, first of all, from an industry standpoint, Michael, we expect Professional to outperform DIY. The industry leading indicators are really strong this year, as you know. The big ones that we found: GDP being positive, the car park is going to go up, vehicle miles driven is growing. And then, of course, vehicles in the sweet spot is the big one that we're seeing growth this year, will be up a couple of points this year on vehicles in the sweet spot.

Of course, that's vehicles and that six- to 11-year-old population. And that's a real positive for the industry overall. That number, as you know, was down in 2017 and then roughly flat last year. So we're seeing a positive trend in the vehicles in the sweet spot, and that tends to benefit the Professional side a little bit more.

Obviously, with cars getting more complicated, that benefits the Professional side. So we expect Professional to grow a little bit above the rate of growth of DIY, call it 4% to 5%, and DIY in the low single digit range. All that said, we're really pleased with the performance of our DIY business in the most recent quarter. It is the first time, as we said in our prepared remarks, that DIY out-comped our Professional business.

Our advertising: Think ahead, think Advance, helped us for sure. Our field team is executing well in the stores. We're driving units per transaction. And obviously, the omnichannel effort is helping us.

So all of those things are helping our internal performance on DIY. On a macro level, though, we would expect Professional to perform higher than DIY over time, and that's sort -- that's how we've modeled our own business as well.

Michael Lasser -- UBS -- Analyst

Into the quarter, the weather's been really funky. Can you give us some sense on how the business performed quarter to date?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

We feel great about where we are year to date. Obviously, it's winter and it's been volatile. The tax refunds are a little bit late, but we clearly like our performance on a year-to-date basis. And I really like the progress on our execution.

If you consider our Professional business, we're seeing our close rate go up, our cross-banner sourcing continues to gain momentum. On the DIY omnichannel side, we continue to drive awareness through think ahead, think Advance. We've seen a nice uptick there. And then we're getting better at managing the cost side of things as well.

So all of these things are positive for us in a quarter-to-date basis.

Operator

Our next question comes from Scot Ciccarelli with RBC Capital Markets.

Scot Ciccarelli -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Scot Ciccarelli. Question about the incremental OPEX you guys outlined. Do you envision the investments that you highlighted as really just a 2019 event? Or is it recognition that you need to continue to invest in the business to position it where you want to be over the longer term?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Let me start and I'll kick it over to Jeff to talk about the longer term. But first of all, in '19, there's a couple of areas that we're investing in, Scot. If you talk about technology and e-commerce, that's, by far, the biggest investment that we're making. It's over half.

Examples here are largely integration-related. So getting to one payroll system, getting to one back-office system, getting to a single warehouse management systems. These are large technology-related platforms that we're implementing across the enterprise and will really simplify the business and reduce complexity in our cost base. In these cases, we have IT OPEX expense in 2019 without the commensurate cost take-outs as we design and implement the new systems.

So we fully expect to remove these costs sometime in the future, obviously, when we're able to retire the old way of doing things, whether that's our payroll or our ERP system. Secondly, in terms of people, you'll recall we had a crisis in terms of turnover on our frontline organization and store operations a couple of years ago. We've now addressed that. Our turnover is down.

And this year, we're making a similar wage investment in our supply chain team to do the very same thing in our distribution centers to drive the turnover down there. And then third, in marketing, we've been building our brand, both in DIY and Professional. I talked about the advertising campaign. As we continue to see the marketing campaign drive our comps and obviously lift our sales growth above the industry average, we're going to continue to invest.

If we don't like the returns there, we can certainly meter it back. But these three areas represent the vast majority of our OPEX investment in '19. And I'll let Jeff talk a little bit about the future.

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Yes, sure. Just in terms of that detail that Tom just provided, some of those clearly have longer tails than others, but we do think this type of investment, we're going to see, not only in '19, but also into 2020. And then we would expect these to normalize after that.

Scot Ciccarelli -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Got it. got it. OK, very helpful. And then just a housekeeping item.

Can you tell us what inflation was in the fourth quarter?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. About two points on a per unit basis, Scot.

Operator

Our next question comes from Dan Wewer with Raymond James.

Dan Wewer -- Raymond James -- Analyst

The first question I had relates to transformation charges. How many additional years beyond 2019 will you continue to set up a line item for this? And does it continue until the company reaches that 14%, 15% EBIT rate?

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Yes. Hey, Dan. In terms of the transformation, you are seeing it start to ramp down. But again, as we continue with the integration we just talked about on some of the previous questions, we're certainly going to see it in '19, and I would expect to continue to see it into '20.

After that, I think it would be fairly de minimis at that point.

Dan Wewer -- Raymond James -- Analyst

And then a second question. You talked about the acceleration in your do-it-yourself revenues exceeding commercial. I know that you seemed to be a little bit more aggressive with the 20% off promotions on your e-commerce offer. Can you talk about what that's contributed to your do-it-yourself sales growth?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, we're certainly seeing strong growth in our e-commerce business. About 70% of the transactions, whether they're DIY, online or retail, then start on a mobile device now. So you really have to be there for the customer when they're doing their initial searches and investigating what they need to do for the job. So we're very excited about that.

We've made a lot of progress improving the quality of our website, the page load speeds, all of those key variables. And t's going to be an omnichannel effort. That whole journey involves online search each time, so we're going to continue to drive our online business. We're going to continue to drive our retail business.

When the customer gets there, we're going to make sure they have all the parts they need. It's essentially adapting to really leveraging our asset base, including our online assets and our physical assets in the stores.

Dan Wewer -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Tom, you sound really excited about the Walmart partnership. Can you discuss how that benefits your guidance for 2019 for sales and for operating margin rate?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Well, first of all, the guide itself, we believe this is going to be a great year for the industry and for AAP. So clearly, we want to see an acceleration of our performance versus last year. Walmart, the initiatives that we have for Walmart, as we said in our prepared remarks, really kick in toward the back end of this year.

There's a couple of phases. The first phase is really to put a broader assortment of parts on to the Walmart website for ship-to-home purposes. And then the second phase is to really stand up what we call pickup today, where the customer can enter into the Walmart website, it'll be a branded online presence that we'll have there on the Walmart website, and they will be able to pick up the part in an Advance store. And that will be toward the back end.

So there isn't a lot of incremental sales contemplated, Dan, in that sales guide. We believe that will be all upside to the sales guide we have.

Operator

Our next question comes from Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer.

Brian Nagel -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst

I've got maybe a couple of questions. First off, just from a bigger picture perspective. Your comments here, and then obviously a lot of indicators throughout the industry have suggested a nice and improving tailwind within the business. If that happens, you're looking at your turnaround at your efforts, do you have an opportunity to accelerate your efforts? Or would you -- or are more or less susceptible of this -- does the tailwind, from a sales perspective, fall to the bottom line?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, it's a good question, Brian. I mean, clearly, there is a high fixed cost base that we have that incremental sales helps us a lot. So we're going to make sure that we're making the investments we need to make for the long term, as we said in a few minutes ago. There are a couple of areas that we feel we have to address.

And eventually, those costs come out in pretty big chunks. If you think about getting to a single payroll system, we currently have four. We've moved to a new payroll system. We need to retire those old systems.

Getting to a single ERP system. We currently have four of those. We want to get to a single system there and retire those systems. So all of the investments we're making this year in the technology space largely pertain to the simplification and the integration of the company.

On the other side of the coin, we're driving the top line. The top line is very important. We want to be competitive in the marketplace. We want to strengthen our customer value Proposition, whether that's on the Professional side or on the DIY side.

And there are some things that we're doing there to drive our business. We believe that the things that we're doing are making us much more relevant. I think if you look at the back half of last year at our actual performance, it was strong relative to the industry, and that's the goal on an ongoing basis. So we're going to continue to drive the top line hard.

To the extent that we exceed the sales guide that we provided this year, we'll make those decisions as they come. But clearly, the industry backdrop is very good. We feel very good about where we are on a year-to-date basis, and we are going to continue to make those decisions as they come along.

Brian Nagel -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst

Got it. That's very helpful. And then the second question I had. You had mentioned in the prepared comments that the dynamic assortments and your efforts on inventory.

So with that, a couple of questions. One, is inventory where it needs to be now? Or should we expect to see a continued build from here? And then second, is there a way to look at this effort and maybe parse out just in of itself, how much that has held back sales? So to the extent that we get inventories into a better position, that alone should would be a driver of sales.

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, first of all, we clearly see opportunities to continue to optimize and reduce our inventory. There's a couple of things that we're doing there, Brian. We plan to start the implementation of cross-banner replenishment between Carquest and Advance in the back half of '19. So essentially, when that's completed, we'll be able to ship parts from legacy Advance distribution centers to legacy Carquest stores and vice versa.

Now obviously, this will enable us to reduce stem miles and further optimize inventory throughout our DC network. Secondly, we're also integrating the Worldpac and Autopart International supply chains. And those two supply chains are starting to come together. We're assorting together.

Bob Cushing is leading all that work. So you think about those first two big work streams, cross-banner replenishment in Advance and Carquest, and then of course, Worldpac and AI. As those two big initiatives are completed, we're working from four supply chains down to two, so that should help us reduce inventory. Now you mentioned dynamic assortment.

What we're learning there, and I think you know this, we've evolved from the old way of assorting, which we used to call probability to sell, to a new way of sorting that is founded in machine learning tools called dynamic assortment. And this is showing us that we can actually increase our turns throughout the supply chain by replacing slow-turning SKUs with more relevant, faster-turning SKUs, pretty basic stuff. But we're very excited about the early returns on dynamic assortment, and you're going to continue to see us optimize our inventory going forward. And I think your point about, have our sales been held back a little bit because of our inventory assortment? I think the answer to that question is yes.

Because as we make these changes, we're seeing the close rate go up. So just by essentially using the dynamic assortment tool that we have, changing out the assortment we have in a category like spark plugs or anything else, we're definitely seeing the close rate improve. So we see opportunities there.

Operator

Our next question comes from Seth Basham with Wedbush Securities.

Seth Basham -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

My first question is around the comp trends in the fourth quarter. Could you give us a little bit more color as to the degree of outperformance of DIY relative to DIFM? Was is 20, 30 basis points? Or was it 200 or 300 basis points?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. It was pretty slight, Seth. We don't break that out specifically, as you know. But it's slightly higher.

The trends through the quarter were similar to what you've heard from others. Our period 11 and 12, which is essentially October, November, was strong; and December, slightly positive, so not as strong as November and October, but slightly positive in December. But the comparative of DIY and Pro was relatively similar.

Seth Basham -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

That's helpful. And as you think about the drivers behind that inflection at DIY out-comping Pro, was it more the market, weather, etc.? Or was it more around some of your initiatives with advertising? Or something else.

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, we definitely feel we're performing better in DIY omnichannel than we had been. Obviously, we do see some syndicated data on that topic that would corroborate that. I do think that we're executing better in the stores. I think that the advertising helped.

We see the awareness numbers, they went up nicely. They're still way too low in our view, but the awareness numbers did go up behind the new advertising. Our buy online, pick up in store execution is improving. All of those things are factors.

So I think our relative performance is stronger in DIY, and I think that's why we're performing better.

Seth Basham -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

Got it. And just one last housekeeping question. You mentioned the impact of inflation in the fourth quarter. But what is it embedded in your guidance for comps in 2019?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

It's similar to what we said. On a per unit basis, it's a couple of points. Obviously, there are still some uncertainty there, Seth, surrounding tariffs. But based on what we see today, that's what we have in there.

Operator

Our next question comes from Bret Jordan with Jefferies.

Bret Jordan -- Jefferies -- Analyst

Yes. On that inflation question, I guess, it sort of seems that maybe you were expecting a couple of points of inflation in 2019, and you expect inflation to represent the majority of your comp and you're not really seeing a lot of unit pickup. Or maybe some better color on that.

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, I mean, again, I think, Bret, our guide itself is in line with our full-year performance last year. I can tell you that everybody in the company is focused on exceeding that sales guide. We think it's going to be a strong year for the industry and for Advance for all the reasons that I've said. I think from our standpoint, we're building the guide -- sorry, we're building our fixed cost base around the sales guide as we did last year.

Our goal is to exceed that sales guide. And all we're trying to do is make sure that we're able to deliver the overall financials of the company. So the goal is to beat the sales guide.

Bret Jordan -- Jefferies -- Analyst

OK. And then a question on the Walmart relationship. Is picking up at Walmart not going to be an option? Are you either going to ship to home or pick up at Advance?

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

At some point, we do plan to have it available to pick up at Walmart. We're rooting this entire partnership in the customer, and what the customer wants is what we're going to do. So we're going to make it as easy as possible for the customer. Obviously, we do believe that the convenience of coming into an Advance store is an advantage, and along with the trusted advice our employees can provide.

But Walmart's been a terrific partner on this. And they've got a great leadership team. We're excited to work collaboratively with them. We've got one of our top people, Nicole Jefferies, is working on this initiative.

She's dedicated to the partnership, she's building out the plans. And I know the Walmart team is very excited about it. So more to come.

Bret Jordan -- Jefferies -- Analyst

What do you see that relationship impact on margin being in 2019? Obviously, you've got some costs built into the development, as well as maybe some revenue share with Walmart. But if you'd sort of carved out how much that might cost you on the front end.

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

We haven't broken that out, Bret. And I mean, obviously, we're going to do with this in a thoughtful way and do it in a way that has a positive impact on our overall financials.

Operator

Our next question comes from Chris Bottiglieri with Wolfe Research.

Chris Bottiglieri -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

I was hoping maybe you could update us on material cost savings. How far along are we in that process? And then as you think about kind of the attacks on inflation in 2019, how do those conversations change in this type of environment? But you're still expecting to post benefits?

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Yes. Sure, Chris. In terms of the material cost, I think one of the things as we go through this cycle, I'll call it phase one, were probably about 80% of the way through these material cost categories, but it doesn't really stop there. We're going to be going back and revisiting categories.

The first round, we really focused heavily on AAP/CQ. As we go back to certain vendors, we're now incorporating Worldpac and AI. So it's an ongoing negotiation. Certainly, with the uncertainties around tariffs and other commodity headwinds, we continue to work closely with our vendor partners.

So we've talked about inflation in 2019, and it's something that we're actively working on with our supplier partners.

Chris Bottiglieri -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Gotcha. And was hoping to quantify what the LIFO reserve was this quarter and what the impact on gross margin was? Like, given the inflation we're seeing, how should we think about that in 2019?

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Sure, yes, yes, yes. That's something we saw in the fourth quarter. Here, it was actually a headwind. You'll see when we publish our 10-K here later on today, it was about a $15 million headwind.

But again, we were able to more than offset that with other actions, including productivity measures. So while it was headwind, to your point, with the increasing cost, the commodities, the tariffs, we are able to more than offset that.

Operator

Our next question comes from Seth Sigman with Credit Suisse.

Seth Sigman -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

I wanted to talk a little bit about cross-banner visibility and just the progress there. Any indication on how much that may be helping the comps currently? And how you see that ramping. And then on the cost side, I know that's had some negative implications in the short term. If you could quantify the impact in the fourth quarter and then just the potential for greater efficiencies next year, that would be helpful.

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. Well, it's a big factor in terms of our comp improvement. When you consider -- let me break it down this way. If you look at our 2018 comp and you compare it to our 2017 comp, we improved by about 430 basis points.

We think that at least half of that is related to overall industry improvement if you think about the comparison to our primary competitors. So what's remaining, there's about 100 or 200-odd -- 205 points or whatever that number is. All of that is around three big things: Cross-banner visibility, our DIY performance and then just general execution. So we would attribute about 80 bps to cross-banner visibility, and it's a very strong, gaining momentum initiative that we have inside the company.

Very excited about it and our team is very excited about it. The cost to optimize it, it's relatively small, but it does cause us to drive around a little bit more than we'd like to, to get the part, and we're going to continue to work at that.

Seth Sigman -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

OK. And then on the gross margin outlook, which I think is implied to be up 20 to 60 bps for the year, can you just walk us through some of the key drivers of that? I think you touched a little bit on the material cost reductions. But maybe specific on the supply chain, which has been a headwind, a lot going on there as you start to close some distribution centers. Any more color on how to think about that as a headwind or potentially less of a headwind in 2019?

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Yes. I think, actually, you touch on a number of those in terms of supply chain, in fact, in the fourth quarter, it was relatively flat on a rate basis as we're lapping those two distribution centers that we opened last year. So we're overcoming some of those headwind with the initiatives that we've been talking about in terms of supply chain. We hope to get some productivity out of that.

Obviously, there's some investment that comes along with it, but we think we can get some productivity there. Material cost optimization, to your point, is going to be ongoing. We're still confident we can see improvements there. And then other productivity measures, including shrink and better managing our slower-moving inventory, as we continue to use things like dynamic assortment, we think this is going to help us get more efficient and will drive those 20 to 60 basis points of improvement.

Operator

Thank you. And I'm currently showing no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back over to Tom Greco for closing remarks.

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, thanks to all of you for joining us. We've completed our second year now in our transformation agenda and in our -- my leadership team and I are extremely proud of the team's execution in '18 and their continued focus to begin '19. So as you've heard today, the diligent efforts and strategic investments we made over the past two years are beginning to bear fruit in our improving results. And while we have a lot of work ahead in our transformation journey, I'm confident we're on the right path with the right plan, and we have the best team members in the industry to help us capitalize on this significant opportunity ahead for AAP.

We look forward to discussing our first quarter results in May. Thank you.

Operator

[Operator signoff]

Duration: 57 minutes

Call Participants:

Elisabeth Eisleben -- Vice President, Investor Relations

Tom Greco -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Jeff Shepherd -- Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Xian Siew -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Chris Horvers -- J.P. Morgan -- Analyst

Michael Lasser -- UBS -- Analyst

Scot Ciccarelli -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Dan Wewer -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Brian Nagel -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst

Seth Basham -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

Bret Jordan -- Jefferies -- Analyst

Chris Bottiglieri -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Seth Sigman -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

More AAP analysis

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

10 stocks we like better than Advance Auto PartsWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Advance Auto Parts wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of January 31, 2019